Regulatory pluralism and the resolution of collective labour disputes in Southeast Asia

This paper proposes a new framework for the analysis of collective labour dispute resolution. It begins by explaining why dominant conceptual frameworks in IR and law scholarship are insufficient on their own to capture plurality regulatory sources that bear upon The authors then draw theoretical insights from studies presence interaction multiple orders, socio-legal resolution, propose enables investigation both formal informal aspects resolution interplay. disaggregates data collection into five components: (i) actors; (ii) nature dispute; (iii) arenas processes; (iv) interactions; (v) outcomes. is particularly tailored to, based evidence from, Southeast Asia, but may also have wider application beyond this region.